In my opinion, both the commentary in the semi and in the final leaned heavily on Tapia's highlight moments he spectacular shots got a lot of airtime, while the longer rallies and the points where he struggled didn't get the same attention. And on social media this gets amplified even more, since most people only see the 30-second clips of his best winners.
my opinion, this has been the case for a while now. Already last year I personally found him less consistent and less decisive in the key moments compared to Coello or Galán. Tapia obviously has those few "alien" shots per match that nobody else on tour can produce, and that's genuinely special, but if you look at the full match, the baseline level and the clutch points, I think Coello shifts more momentum when he's on, and Galán keeps a higher floor even on his worse days.
Yesterday's result fits a pattern we've been seeing across several tournaments. Chingotto right now is on a genuinely incredible level: his reading of the game, his positioning, the intensity, the mental management of the key points and Galán is just perfection in evertyhing! Coello is a machine, I love his game.
P.S.and this is something the highlights don't really show,the semi against Stupaczuk/Yanguas wasn't a great night for Tapia either. The result looks comfortable on paper, but they actually had stretches where they were in real trouble.
The semi's were exactly what I'm talking about. Even though they won Tapia's performance was waaay off his standards. Even on bad lobs he wouldn't try to smash, just harmless cross court bande/viboras